THE
EFFECT OF OWNERSHIP CONCENTRATION ON CORPORATE PERFORMANCE: A CASE STUDY OF
COCA
– COLA (NIGERIAN BOTTLING COMPANY PLC.
ABSTRACT
The
study is a perception survey effect of concentration on corporate performance
in Coca Cola Nigeria Bottling Company Plc. It defines ownership concentration
in corporate performance as a process that facilitate influence among
individuals when are otherwise key to company success. It assures that
ownership concentration involvement enhance efficiency in corporate performing.
The research question addressed the extent of the relationship ownership
concentration in corporate performance in Coca Cola Nigerian Bottling Company
Plc, which is the place of the study. While the duration of study is between
April and January 2016. A descriptive research design was used in executing the
study using 200 randomly selected respondents from a population of 6,141
employees for questionnaire administration. However, 160 questionnaires were
returned. In addition, there were face to face interviews and collection of
secondary data about the company being studied. The aspect of the study is the
use of cross – sectional survey research designed in generating the required
primary data. Data collected were analyzed using descriptive and inferential
statistics result from the data analysis indicated that significant
relationship exist between ownership concentration and corporate performance.
The research therefore concludes that significant relationship exist between ownership
concentration and corporate performance in Coca Cola Nigerian Bottling Company
Plc. Also we recommended among others: encouragement of work teams, improvement of
reward system, improvement of reward system, encouragement of promote share
holding, improvement in internal communication chemicals, creating a healthy
operating environment and training and re-tray of employees.
Keywords: Ownership Concentration,
corporate performance corporate governance, Coca Cola Nigeria Bottling Company
Plc Ownership, Profitably Employees
TABLE OF CONTENT
Title
page
Declaration
Approval
page
Dedication
Acknowledgement
Abstract
Table
of Content
Abstract
CHAPTER ONE:
INTRODUCTION
1.1
Background
of the study- - - - - - - -
1.2
Statement
of the problem- - - - - - - -
1.3
Objectives
of the study- - - - - - - - -
1.4
Research
Questions- - - - - - - - -
1.5
Research
Hypotheses- - - - - - - - -
1.6
Significance
of the study- - - - - - - -
1.7
Scope
and Limitation of the study- - - - - - -
1.8
Research
Methodology - - - - - - - -
1.9
Definition
of Terms- - - - - - - - -
1.10
Organization
of the study- - - - - - - -
CHAPTER
TWO:
REVIEW
OF RELATED LITERATURE
2.1 Review of Related Literature- - - - - - - -
2.2 Theoretical Background- - - - - - - -
2.3 History of Coca Cola Nigeria Bottling
Company Plc- - - -
2.3.1 Company Overview- - - - - - - - -
2.3.2 Current Ownership Structure of - - - - - - -
Coca
Cola Nigeria Bottling Company Plc- - - - - -
2.3.3 Annual Production of NBC Plc- - - - - - - -
2.3.4 Challenges Facing Beverages Industries in
Nigeria- - - -
CHAPTER THREE:
METHODOLOGY OF THE STUDY
3.1 Introduction (Background)- - - - - - - -
3.2 Research Design- - - - - - - - - -
3.3 Population of the study- - - - - - - -
3.4 Sampling Technique - - - - - - - - -
3.5 Instrument for data collection- - - - - - - -
3.6 Validity of the instrument- - - - - - - -
3.7 Method of Data Analysis - - - - - - - -
CHAPTER FOUR:
DATA ANALYSIS AND PRESENTATION OF
RESULT.
4.1 Distribution of responses - - - - - - - -
4.1.1 Range of service experience of the respondents- - - -
4.1.2 The means responses on the relationship
between
ownership concentration and corporate
performance
in Coca Cola Nigerian Bottling Company Plc - - -
4.1.3 The Goodness – of – fit chi-square- - - - - - -
4.1.4 The means of responses on the relationship
between
ownership concentration and
enhance
official in corporate performance in
Coca
Cola Nigerian Bottling Company Plc. - - - - -
CHAPTER FIVE: SUMMARY, CONCLUSION
AND RECOMMENDATION
5.1 Summary and Findings - - - - - - -
5.2 Conclusion - - - - - - - - - -
5.3 Recommendation- - - - - - - - - -
Bibliography- - - - - - - - - -
Appendix 1- - - - - - - - - -
Appendix 2- - - - - - - - - -
Appendix 3- - - - - - - - - -
CHAPTER ONE
INTRODUCTION
1.1
Background
of the Study
Ownership
concentration is one side of the concept ownership structure. The concept of
ownership structure can be defined along two dimensions: (i) ownership
concentration, (ii) ownership mix. The former refers to the share of the
largest owner and is influenced by absolute risk and monitoring costs,
while the latter is related to the
identity of the major shareholders such as ownership concentration, foreign
ownership domestic ownership, etc (Nguyen et al, 2015). According to classens
and Djankov cited in Nguyen etal (2015), the overall concentration of ownership
as well as particular types of investors (ownership concentration and ownership
mix) are responsible for the changes in profitability and labour productivity.
The research of sun and Tong (2003) showed that state ownership having negative
impacts on firms performance in China; While foreign ownership does not show
uniformly strong, positive impacts on firms performance, can be beneficial in
many ways such as improving commitment productivity, morale and harnessing
internal resources and teamwork.
Apparently,
as ownership concentration is believed to influence performance. Banz (1981)
had found that ownership and size have an effect on firm performance. May make
big effects on business incentives, merges and acquisition, competition and
oversight of agency. The exist as a substantial fact on whether and how the
effect of ownership concentration on corporate performance. This as informed
the subject as an important and ongoing debate in the corporate environment.
Uwalomiva and Olamide (2012) have studied the relationship between ownership
concentration with the performance of the 31 companies operating in Nigeria
financial sector in the period 2006 – 2010. By using regression models with
dependent variable is the rate of return on total assets, the independent
variables are the rate of ownership of shareholders (members of board of
Directors), the rate of ownership of foreign shareholders has shown that (1)
the company has shareholders as members of the Board of Directors will better;
(2) the foreign shareholders would also bring positive results in the company’s
operations, due to the company management more efficient, and to the skills and
new techniques.
Furthermore,
Clerk and Wojcik (2005) had argued that high ownership concentration indicate a
more closed corporate governance regime, with less information available to
outside investors and a high potential for insider trading, companies with more
closed corporate governance tend to exhibit more votatile stock market prices.
In brief high ownership concentration tends to inhibit corporate stock market
returns. Continuing the study, clerk and Wojic, (2005) examined the financial
valuation of a German model. The relationship of ownership concentration and
firm performance ownership concentration and market performance were studied
would encourage a long-term competitive and investment strategy. They show that
financial markets discount ownership concentration and there is a significant
negative relationship between ownership concentration and the average daily
rate of return.
In
addition, common evidence showed in developed countries like the U.S. and U.K,
nations like central and Eastern Europe or in developing countries (Gedajlovic
and Shapiro 1998). One reason might be the fact that many developing economics
are characterized by considerable family ownership listed corporations
(Claessens et al 2000). And also emerging markets have different characteristic
such as different political, economic and institutional conditions, which limit
the application of developed markets empirical models.
In
developing countries, micco et al (2004) identified a strong relationship
between ownership that state – owned banks tens to have lower profitability
than their private counterparts, and foreign – owned banks tend to be
characterized by higher profitability. Kwuri (2013) studies the effects of
ownership concentration on Banks profitability in Kenya. The result showed that
ownership concentration is negatively correlated with bank profitability. The
Foreign ownership and the domestic ownership are also positive correlated with
bank profitability.
Ownership
concentration has been widely studied and found to have effect on corporate
performance. However, the effect on corporate performance could showed a
negative effect, as while as positive effect. significantly ownership
concentration types also play an imperative role in this, such as institutional
individual, government and foreign ownership. They suggest to us the nature of
ownership structure, shareholding as important in determine the ownership
concentration on its performance. The particular attention in manufacturing
emanates from the conviction that the sector is a potential instrument of
modernization, a creator of jobs and a generator of positive spill – over
effects (Tybout 2000), It against this background that we carried out a
research on the effect of ownership concentration on corporate performance
using Coca- Cola Plc as a case study.
1.2 Statement
Of The Problem
Due
to the current rate of business failure there is an unsurge of interest to no
why some company succeed and why some fails. As the critical life wire of a
company, how can ownership concentration properly value? Also, what effect does
ownership concentration play in enhancing corporate performance and managerial
efficiency of a corporate organization? many business organization due to lack
of proper ownership concentration control has suffered great losses. some
companies have gone under due to the negative impact on either corporate
performance under – performance.
The
aim of ownership concentration is to ensure significant monitoring cost and
minimize risk, whilst at the same time maintaining profitability and labour
productivity. Clearly, there are some problems in having either too little
ownership concentration or high ownership concentration. Basically, there are
effect of ownership concentration on corporate performance. these are competitive and investment strategy,
profitability, return on assets, return on equity, productivity, profitability
and managerial efficiency.
This
research work intend to examine the effect of ownership concentration on
corporate performance levels. This work however, intends highlight the probable
solution to problems arising from negative impact of ownership concentration.
Hence,
for corporate performance to excel in improved productivity, increase
commitment of the work force, profitability and managerial efficiency, there is
need for ownership, concentration to ensure relationship that favour changes in
profitability and labour productivity. There is also a need for a relationship
to exist between ownership structure, ownership concentration efficiency of a
corporate performance.
Theoretically,
ownership concentration over company is assumed to increase commitment of on
the part of management control, this leading to improved productivity. Secondly
there is popular belief that ownership concentration has a way of assuring
industrial harmony by creating positive correlation with profitability, thereby
leading to sustainable performance and by incentive that rob on industrial
relationship between ownership structure, size of the board of directors,
managerial shareholding and employees. It is against this backdrop that we
carry out an empirical study on the theoretical proportion of the effect of ownership
concentration on corporate performance, using Coca-Cola Plc as a case study.
This work is to find out the extent of convergenence or Divergence between
theory and practice in Coca – Cola Plc.
1.3 Objective
of the Study
The
General Objectives of the study is to determine the effect of ownership
concentration has on corporate performance with a view to suggesting some
measure of improving corporate performance, profitability and managerial
efficiency.
To
meet it general objective, the study will focus on the specific objectives:
i.
To
inquire the effect of ownership concentration in Coca – Cola Bottling Company
Plc.
ii.
To
find out the level of ownership concentration in Coca – Cola Nigeria Bottling
Company Plc.
iii.
To
ascertain the impact of owner concentration on Coca – Cola performance and
managerial efficiency.
iv.
To
suggest better ways of achieving ownership concentration. Thus achieving good
performance for owner’s shareholders, management and employees.
v.
To
determine the problems associated with ownership concentration at Coca – Cola
Nigeria Bottling Company Plc.
1.4 Research
Questions
1.
Does
ownership concentration affect corporate performance?
2.
Does
ownership concentration affect management decision making?
3.
How
consistent do ownership concentration affect corporate performance?
4.
What
are the problem associated with ownership concentration in Coca – Cola Nigerian
Bottling Company Plc.
5. Ownership concentration motivate
increase corporate performance.
1.5 Research Hypotheses
In
order to ensure the objectives of the research and also provide answers to the
research problems, the following research hypotheses are formulated:
Ho: There
is no significant relationship between ownership concentration and corporate performance in Coca-Cola NBC
Plc.
Hi: There is significant relationship between ownership concentration
and corporate performance in Coca-Cola NBC Plc.
Ho: There
is no significant relationship between ownership concentration and enhance
efficiency in corporate performance in Coca-Cola NBC Plc.
Hi: There
is significant relationship between ownership concentration and enhance
efficiency in corporate performance in Coca-Cola NBC Plc.
1.6
Significance of The Study
The study is an attempt to
explore the effect of ownership concentration on corporate performance. However
it is partly a new subject for researches in Nigeria. Looking towards all
scholarly studies completed in Nigeria, it is observed that there is
insignificance research work done on this subject meter and this has created a
wide gap, which needs to be filled up by the present and the future human
resources management scholars.
Furthermore, this research will
show the significance of ownership concentration and their effect on manage
efficiency, profitability and organizational productions. This will help the
management of coca-cola plc, the government, manufacturing and merchandizing
company, individuals, researchers and other interested persons who may wish to
carry out a researcher on ownership concentration.
1.7 Scope And Limitation Of The
Study
The study is limited to coca-cola
plc, the available secondary date and other sources such as internet,
libraries, journal, newspaper and primary date collected by means of structured
questionnaires.
The researches of this mequitude
is not without some limitation. The speed and cost of getting materials/ date
have limited effect on the study, to this end, the bottleneck associated with
getting materials from coca-cola plc actually slowed drummed date guarding and
analysis.
The above limitation does not
however in anyway nullify the validity and reliability of the reclusion that
have been researched in this research, it only makes room for unavoidable errors.
1.8 Definition of Terms:
Ownership: The
people who have some thing to themselves. That is being the founder or creator
of a business entity or business enterprise, even a building.
Ownership
Structure: This
entail owner ship concentration and ownership mix in the form of shareholders,
identify of major owners, mountoricy cost risk and corporate governance.
Corporate
Performance: The
act sign which an organization systematically does it business excellently.
This also entails an effective result.
Corporate
Governance: The
putting a machine that ensure effective direction and controlled of business.
Management: This is made up of top and
middle level management. Top management includes shareholders, board of
directors and managing director, while middle management includes heeds of
department, manager deputy and assistant.
Profitability: The platform that ensure a gain
from doing selling or doing business. That is making a lot of financial
monetary gain in non- monetary gain but impact full.
Institution: This entail a large organization
such as a corporate entity engage in commercial ventures.
Commitment: The state of quality of being
dedicated to a cause or activity.
Productivity: This means a measure of the
affiance of production, that is of production’s capability to create income,
which is measured by the formula reel output value virus reel input value
Section Making: This is cognitive process result
in the selection of a belief or course of action among several alternative
possibility.
1.9
Organization of The Study
The research will be organization
into five chapters made up as follows:
Chapter One: This chapter will be made up of
the introduction, statement of problem, objective, scope, significance,
definition of terms and the organization of the study.
Chapter Two: Then cover the reviews of
related interties, that is what has alertly been written and said about
ownership concentration and its relevance to corporate performance.
Chapter Three: This chapter deals with the
researcher methodology, that includes researches design, sources of date,
method of date analysis, questionnaire design and administration e.g.
Chapter Four: This chapter put formed discussion
on date presentation and analysis.
Chapter Five: This is the final chapter and it
comprises of the summery, conclusion and recommendation and areas for further
researcher.
No comments:
Post a Comment